News Briefs D.C. trip delayed
A trip to Washington, D.C. that Findlay and Ottawa officials were planning to make this week has been postponed because of the inclement weather.
Findlay Mayor Pete Sehnert said officials have rescheduled the trip for Feb. 23 to meet with a lobbying group and congressional representatives regarding federal spending on flood control projects.
Fostoria requires clearing sidewalks
FOSTORIA -- Fostoria residents are responsible for removing snow and ice from sidewalks within 12 hours of a storm, according to police Capt. Patrick Brooks.
The city code covers residential owners or tenants, and business owners of properties which abut a sidewalk.
An offense is a minor misdemeanor, with a fine of up to $100. Each day constitutes a separate offense.
Library in Forest reschedules event
FOREST -- Because of the expected inclement weather, the Forest-Jackson Public Library has rescheduled its Valentine luncheon planned for Thursday to 11:30 a.m. Thursday, Feb. 18.
Reservations are required. Anyone with questions can call the library at 419-273-2400.
Disc golf tourney set for Saturday
The Ray Heverling Charity Ice Bowl Tournament has been rescheduled for 1 p.m. Saturday at Riverbend Recreation Area, off Ohio 568 east of Findlay.
Registration begins at noon.
The tournament was canceled last Saturday because of a snowstorm.
The Disc Golf Community Association, in cooperation with the Hancock Park District, sponsors the event. Proceeds go to the Family Center of Findlay-Hancock County.
For more information contact Nathan Buck at p_nate@thecatalystcc.com or 419-306-7405. Entry fee is $20. Additional donations are accepted.
Housing Authority meeting postponed
Because of an expected winter storm this week, the Hancock Metropolitan Housing Authority has canceled its regular board meeting scheduled for Thursday. It will be held at 8 a.m. Thursday, Feb. 18 at the Family Center.
Fostoria library to close Monday
FOSTORIA -- Kaubisch Memorial Public Library will be closed Monday, Feb. 15, in observance of Presidents Day.
Crime Of The Week
Findlay/Hancock County Crime Stoppers is looking for information about a break-in at the Arlington Pharmacy, 200 Main St., at 12:51 a.m. Dec. 28.
A glass pane in the front door of the business was shattered, and entry was made. Once inside, the perpetrators took prescription medications and fled on foot.
Two white males were seen running from the business. The males were possibly in their late teens to early 20s, and possibly entered a vehicle.
People with information about this or any other crime that would lead to an arrest or indictment will be eligible for a cash reward of up to $1,000.
Crime Stoppers can be called weekdays from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. at 419-425-TIPS or 419-425-8477. Callers can remain anonymous.
The Web site is www.hancockcrimestoppers.org.
15 Comments (2 pages)
Latest comments listed first.Maybe it wasn't a guy running for office - maybe it's a guy who's still there.
Maybe we're both right. Who knows? Maybe the moderator can ask Joy Brown - if it was Joy Brown who wrote the article.
Now, I'm curious.
Maybe Sehnert could post a bio somewhere - like here.
I know you didn't mean anything bad by saying "city pig," vs. "highway hog," because they're common expressions of irreverence.
But the thing that cracks me up, is that people think if you have a blue-collar background, everything you do or say is dismissed and marginalized.
Let's look at it this way: the so-called conservatives talk about the "entitlement mentality" of middle-class and lower middle and poor people.
While I'd agree there are people in that demographic who fit that profile, the door swings both ways on that.
The people who want to think they're part of some "elite" class, have an entitlement mentality themselves.
This country is headed for what people have coined, "The South American Model."
In South America, 3% of the population is uber-wealthy and the rest of the population is dirt-poor; there is no middle class - or at least, not in the same numbers and percentages as America has seen in her recent past.
So in South America, the uber-wealthy live in walled fortresses with their iron gates and armed gaurds and tasteful, mason walls surrounding the outer perimeter - and the rambling, sprawling mansions on the inside. And in close proximity? Ususally, a golf course!
And so it's becoming right here in this country.
I'm not saying that rich people should be looked down on - but they owe us people in the middle class the same courtesy.
We're being brainwashed into believing that money is a measure of your worth as a human being. So from "their" point of view, if you didn't inherit a huge trust - or if you were lucky enough to make your hard work and dedication pay off (and luck is the operative word, because we all know tons of people who work hard and are dedicated - who could probably run their boss' business better than the boss - but what the wealthy don't understand, is that luck played a bigger role in their ability to make money than their narcissm allows them to admit) but here's the deal: we're being brainswashed into believing that if you don't have a ton of money - your opinion doesn't count.
And that's the essence of the arguments of those who make fun of Sehnert, because what they're really saying is this: since you're not a millionaire you don't deserve to be in a position of authority - and your opinions don't count.
What they're saying is, is if you don't have a ton of money, you must not be smart. Like I said, with those who do have a ton of money, they don't realize that "Lady Luck" played a bigger role in their wealth than their narcissism allows them to admit.
Sure: they may have worked hard. Sure, they may be smart. Sure, they did everything right. But look at all the people who fit the same criteria - who are still middle class, or worse. What's the difference? Luck - plain and simple.
So by them having this attitude that if you're not rich, you're not smart, they're not recognizing the role luck played in their lives - and they don't realize that they have less to do with luck than they realize.
What's this have to do with a middle-class guy in the mayor's office?
Well, look at the $1 bill. The guy on that bill had to borrow money from friends to get enough money to take the trip from his home in Virginia, to his first inaugeration.
Washington was constantly on the verge of bankruptcy.
So: how do you reconcile the idea that money is a measure of a human being, with the fact the guy who is credited with being the founding father of this nation, was broke?
Ben Franklin was rich; so was Thomas Jefferson - but Washington wasn't.
years
You're almost right; Pete did park cars at BVH before being elected. And before that he was in the Marines...but he was a city pig, not a highway hog.
mabye you
To let come in.. who are they protecting and who should they be looking out for.
Guys take your gloves off;;;;;; now and lets fight these guys out of town,
No more funding.. No more lies, and there cheap shots of discrediting people. its just business where just going to have to lay you off due to lack. Of work
Pack up and get out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you trying to imply that anyone who served in a branch of the military that is highly regarded as this nation's "tip of the spear" isn't smart enough? If so, is it that he isn't smart, because he put himself in a position to lay his life on the line for his country, while guys like you lived a life of relative luxury instead?
Or could it be, that he isn't smart enough, because he put himself in a position where he layed his life on the line with each of the 60,000 contacts he made as a state patrolman?
I couldn't imagine how much courage it would take to pull over a vehicle that matches the description of someone who is armed and dangerous, and it's 3 a.m., and it's 10 below zero, and you know for a fact that back-up is at least 15 minutes away - and it's completely dark.
But nooooo! This guy is able to do that - and God only knows out of the 60,000 contacts he made in his career with the Ohio State Highway Patrol - God only knows how many of those 60,000 contacts were EXTREMELY dangerous people.
Who knows how many lives this state highway patrolman saved, by risking his life to pull over someone with an a.p.b. out on them, because of some violent crime they recently committed. Maybe he saved my life by putting that person behind bars - maybe he saved yours - but in the grand scheme of things, we'll never know.
Yes, he's smart enough to go after the craftiest and wiliest of criminals, drug runners, murderers and all-around scum and vilanny, but because he was an hourly worker, God forbid should he put himself in a position where he can ferret out the white-collar hustlers and flim-flam artists who try to make going after their own interests seem like a benefit to everyone - even though it only benefits a chosen few.
As far as I'm concerned, if he's smart enough and brave enough to go after the blue-collar criminals with over 60,000 contacts prior to his retirment with the Ohio State Highway Patrol, and if he's smart enough and brave enough to lay his life on the line as a member of the armed forces affectionately referred to as America's "tip of the spear," my guess is, he's emminetly qualified to go after the white-collar hustlers who use flim-flam and industry-specific techno-babble to cover up their many sins - and make them appear as a huge benefit to the community - and I think that's what really bothers you the most about him.
If people only knew. Sure, I know for a fact there has to be some secrecy - at least for a while. If you were to divulge who was thinking of locating here - while they were in the selection process - that would make the deal go south - and I think any reasonable person knows this.
But what about 6 months - or a year later? The secrecy is no longer required because the selection has already been made.
At that point, as long as you have tax abatement negotiating authority, you should be required to divulge who you chose to ignore with tax abatement offers. This is the public's money - and your comments about the public working for the private sector are correct - but the door swings both ways, and when you spend (or have the authority to tell people they don't have to spend money that should be going to the public) then you should be accountable to make sure that the public's interests are served, rather than simply the interests of the members who comprise the inner-circle of your organization.
Here's the bottom line: authority to grant tax abatements should come with some common sense accountability.
As far as a former valet being mayor: what you're saying is EXTREMELY elitist.
It doesn't take a Warren Buffet to figure out that stifling wage competition has resulted in minimum wage jobs and more minimum wage jobs, and more minimum wage jobs.
The article recently in the paper about the era of good paying jobs is a thing of the past. How do you explain your organization's handling of the A. Schulman fiasco? They intially wanted to start at $24/hour. Who's biting whose hand, now? Seriously. Your organization bends over backwards for minimum wage providers like Wal-Mart and all the little factories in Tall Timbers, but you won't lift a finger to help A. Schulman get past all the red tape the Regional Planning Commission put them through. Why? Because they pay good, that's why - and that's just what you've made your organization all about: keeping good paying jobs out of this area.
Go ahead: splatter all the right-wing dogma you want - nobody's buying it, except for those who either think they're in "the clique," or those who actually are. For everyone else: no one's buying it.
The only thing you're upset about, is the fact with all the fancy terminology you guys use to confuse, baffle and bore people into ignoring the important work you do, you can't even fool a former parking attendent with all the b.s. your best writers can dream up.
How sad is that?